Elon Musk's battle for free speech

Elon Musk's battle for free speech flushes out the enemy...

Updated May 13th 2022

 

The conspiracy of liberal elite money, influence and politics to intimidate Elon Musk is typical and deeply sinister. The effort to associate all aspects of populism with the "extreme right wing" betrays the liberals' fear that free speech will inevitably expose the cultural Marxism that is the foundation of its subversive manipulation of public opinion. Control of the permitted vocabulary of public debate first "became a thing" in the form of political correctness, and has got far worse over recent times.

A cabal of activist organizations and NGOs signed a letter to companies who advertise on Twitter, warning them to reconsider if Elon Musk makes changes Musk has pledged to lift the 'censorship' of Twitter: critics worry that he will give free rein to those trafficking in hate speech and dangerous scientific theories. The letter writers said that Musk 'will further toxify our information ecosystem and be a direct threat to public safety'.

But these people seem mostly concerned that they are going to lose their ability to set the social agenda with the cancel culture that started with political correctness and peaked when a president of the US was de-platformed for becoming more powerful than Twitter's ability to intimidate.

They wrote: "Twitter risks becoming a cesspool of misinformation, with your brand attached".

Musk replied, wanting to know who was behind the 26 groups signing the letter, and commenting: 'Sunlight is the best disinfectant' 

Some of the most high-profile "liberal" figures have joined together to encourage advertisers to boycott Twitter if Elon Musk brings in his promised policy of unfettered 'free speech.'

After 26 activist organisations and NGOs signed a letter to Twitter advertisers asking them to boycott the platform if Elon Musk makes content moderation changes, it has been revealed that some of these groups are funded or tied to billionaire philanthropist George Soros, former US presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

After Musk tweeted about “who funds these organisations that want to control your access to information,” the reports surfaced that the groups behind the anti-Musk campaign belong to wealthy Democrat donors and their family foundations, labour unions and the governments of European nations.

Yes folks, it's the usual suspects of the WEF and New World Order globalism. And it is high time we defined the word "liberal".

Does the "silent majority" at last have a champion who is willing to stick his neck out and confront the occupants of the Washington swamp and Westminster blob that have stealthily established themselves as the alternative to democratic government, as vast vested interests learned to manipulate mainstream and social media to achieve their ends without the inconvenience of the democratic process.

 

The Daily Mail eagerly ran with the story and Liberal Hivemind posted a Youtube video on the topic...

 

If you are getting the impression that democrtactic governments have been dangerously undermined by the "new money" that has exploded as the tech industry has learned how to exploit online and electronic media using embedded spyware with "atrtificial interlligence" to track and tag users - whilst avoiding all accountability and traditional checks and balances of the traditional media, you would be right. 

Long established bricks and mortar businesses that grew up over a hundred years, employing millions in traditional enterprises were overtraken in value by new tech companies less than 2 years old, that got lucky and rode the hype that was built on bankers' fear of losing out on the next big thing.

The subversive quality of this effort relies on the smokescreen and distraction created by and amplified by social media with its focus on trivia - including celebrity lawsuits, Partygate and Beeergate. We are being buried in trivia while Soros and his cohorts steadily undermine the democratic foundations of any country that has been willing to allow its culture driven by tech manipulation and cancel culture.

It is ironic and tragic that the UK entered the internet age with its BBC World Service respected and largely in control of the soft diplomacy that had been deployed over 75 years - establishing a reputation as a trusted and reliable source of world news and comment.

No unelected and unaccountable offshore behemoth like Meta, Alphabet, tiktok, Microsoft, Apple or Amazon should have been permitted the opportunity to manipulate the judgement of UK residents using information acquired by stealth and spyware.

UK politicians were warned 10 years ago that they would lose control the social agenda unless something was done to kerb the likes of Facebook and Twitter, and now it is too late. UK owned operated and responsible alternatives to all the major social platforms may be the only way forward.