Society:JBP on the value of marriage

Start July 27th 2024

Here's another rolling topic that hopes to gather moss as it careers through the labyrinth of social media. V0.11

Dr Jordan B Peterson has probably nailed this issue in one post on Twitter;

https://x.com/jordanbpeterson/status/181723806527596148

...but I will keep this post open and evolving.

The subject of marriage is central to the debate around gender and the responsibility for the protection of "minors" in times when the imagery of the Olympic opening ceremony promotes Armageddon, and the various "vignettes" celebrate a variety of popular modern perversions and debauchery.

JBP begins...

People grow up when they get married.

It is probably better to get married when you are young because then you grow up. And then what else matures people? 

I have met very few people who have fully matured who do not have children. I think there is a reason for that, a real technical reason. You are not mature until someone else matters more than you—period. Maybe that will be your wife or your husband, but probably not. They might matter as much as you, and maybe that is the right amount. But when you have children, they matter more than you, unless there is something seriously wrong with you.

Very few parents, if push came to shove, would not die for their children. As soon as someone else matters more than you do in some fundamental sense, you have taken another step toward a true, mature responsibility. I do not see that you can do that without necessity, and there is nothing that screams necessity more than an infant.

Now if you have not already taken a look at the Elon Musk interview with Jordan Peterson, do so now. Use the option for speeded-up playout if you need. 

Between the two of them, they appear to be monopolising the world of obvious common sense, to provide the silenced majority with an unequivocal voice that has got the silencers raffled. Musk and Peterson present a vast "attack surface" to the liberal alliance that embodies the fashionable left/woke activism that is mostly distinguished by its readiness to express it's view using "shoot first/ discuss later" cancel culture tactics that now control and influence the media with manipulated woke social engineering to suit WEF agendas.

The polarisation of the tribes of "us" and "them" has forced most people into adopting one or the other and it is fascinating that the split continues to be around 50/50.

The notion that Labour has anything approaching a morally sustainable right to govern based on manipulation of the system to sustain the illusion that 34% of the vote is a landslide mandate...but hardly anyone is speaking out about this at present. 

Elon Musk's battle for free speech

Elon Musk's battle for free speech flushes out the enemy...

Updated May 13th 2022

 

The conspiracy of liberal elite money, influence and politics to intimidate Elon Musk is typical and deeply sinister. The effort to associate all aspects of populism with the "extreme right wing" betrays the liberals' fear that free speech will inevitably expose the cultural Marxism that is the foundation of its subversive manipulation of public opinion. Control of the permitted vocabulary of public debate first "became a thing" in the form of political correctness, and has got far worse over recent times.

A cabal of activist organizations and NGOs signed a letter to companies who advertise on Twitter, warning them to reconsider if Elon Musk makes changes Musk has pledged to lift the 'censorship' of Twitter: critics worry that he will give free rein to those trafficking in hate speech and dangerous scientific theories. The letter writers said that Musk 'will further toxify our information ecosystem and be a direct threat to public safety'.

But these people seem mostly concerned that they are going to lose their ability to set the social agenda with the cancel culture that started with political correctness and peaked when a president of the US was de-platformed for becoming more powerful than Twitter's ability to intimidate.

They wrote: "Twitter risks becoming a cesspool of misinformation, with your brand attached".

Musk replied, wanting to know who was behind the 26 groups signing the letter, and commenting: 'Sunlight is the best disinfectant' 

Some of the most high-profile "liberal" figures have joined together to encourage advertisers to boycott Twitter if Elon Musk brings in his promised policy of unfettered 'free speech.'

After 26 activist organisations and NGOs signed a letter to Twitter advertisers asking them to boycott the platform if Elon Musk makes content moderation changes, it has been revealed that some of these groups are funded or tied to billionaire philanthropist George Soros, former US presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

After Musk tweeted about “who funds these organisations that want to control your access to information,” the reports surfaced that the groups behind the anti-Musk campaign belong to wealthy Democrat donors and their family foundations, labour unions and the governments of European nations.

Yes folks, it's the usual suspects of the WEF and New World Order globalism. And it is high time we defined the word "liberal".

Does the "silent majority" at last have a champion who is willing to stick his neck out and confront the occupants of the Washington swamp and Westminster blob that have stealthily established themselves as the alternative to democratic government, as vast vested interests learned to manipulate mainstream and social media to achieve their ends without the inconvenience of the democratic process.

 

The Daily Mail eagerly ran with the story and Liberal Hivemind posted a Youtube video on the topic...

 

If you are getting the impression that democrtactic governments have been dangerously undermined by the "new money" that has exploded as the tech industry has learned how to exploit online and electronic media using embedded spyware with "atrtificial interlligence" to track and tag users - whilst avoiding all accountability and traditional checks and balances of the traditional media, you would be right. 

Long established bricks and mortar businesses that grew up over a hundred years, employing millions in traditional enterprises were overtraken in value by new tech companies less than 2 years old, that got lucky and rode the hype that was built on bankers' fear of losing out on the next big thing.

The subversive quality of this effort relies on the smokescreen and distraction created by and amplified by social media with its focus on trivia - including celebrity lawsuits, Partygate and Beeergate. We are being buried in trivia while Soros and his cohorts steadily undermine the democratic foundations of any country that has been willing to allow its culture driven by tech manipulation and cancel culture.

It is ironic and tragic that the UK entered the internet age with its BBC World Service respected and largely in control of the soft diplomacy that had been deployed over 75 years - establishing a reputation as a trusted and reliable source of world news and comment.

No unelected and unaccountable offshore behemoth like Meta, Alphabet, tiktok, Microsoft, Apple or Amazon should have been permitted the opportunity to manipulate the judgement of UK residents using information acquired by stealth and spyware.

UK politicians were warned 10 years ago that they would lose control the social agenda unless something was done to kerb the likes of Facebook and Twitter, and now it is too late. UK owned operated and responsible alternatives to all the major social platforms may be the only way forward.